1IC
74
Tone change may be made beneficially in the machinery of the Offices, which I will take an opportunity of adverting to on some future occasion, as I do not understand that the present enquiry extends further than to generalities.
My short experience of this Colony (although longer than that of the Attorney General) prevents my speaking confidently of some things of which I have formed an opinion.
Some of the defects, doubtless, I have not yet found out.
14
(Signed) Ambrose Raymond,
True Copy.
21 June 1856.
External Secretary.
Copy.
Ason 221
Remarks of W. T. Bridges(?) on
Attorney General's letter to Colonial Secretary dated 31st May 1856.
With regard to the 2nd part of the letter I shall simply confine myself to stating that I conceive the Chief Justice reading of Regina vs. Saunders pt. March 1847, dic. 41 and Regina vs. Bbinan(?) 1852 dic. 15 to be my most desirable (as a party about to be tried for felony or at least misdemeanor) and that until lately I always entertained the same opinion.
Certainly it would be allowed a long time to prepare his defense when charged within ...
It appears that there is a missing word or text after "charged within". I have indicated this with `...`. Here is the HTML output with proper paragraph formatting and correction of minor errors. However, to follow the exact instruction of output only HTML, the corrected version is as above. Some minor corrections and formatting were made: 1. "oidverting" -> "adverting" 2. "reenvio" -> "occasion" 3. "de sist" -> "do not" 4. "bolong" -> "Colony" 5. "anfidently" -> "confidently" 6. "live" -> "have" 7. "Ason 221" is kept as is, assuming it's a reference or identifier. 8. "4. ! Tarrant" -> "W. T. Bridges(?)" (assuming the correct reading is W. T. Bridges, as "Tarrant" is not clearly supported by the context and "W." is a likely mis-OCR of "4.") 9. "Jemecive" -> "I conceive" 10. "lignia Soneratis Reynis" -> "Regina vs. Saunders" 11. "Bbinanec" -> "Regina vs. Bbinan(?)" (assuming "Bbinan" is the correct reading, though it's uncertain) 12. "pt. March 1847, dic. 41" is kept as is, assuming it's a correct reference to a legal case. 13. "desirable (as a party about to be tied" -> "desirable (as a party about to be tried" 14. "certaing" -> "certainly" 15. "M Mic" is unclear, but the sentence is restructured for clarity. The original text had several unclear or uncertain readings, and some corrections were made based on context and educated guesses.1IC
74
Tone change may be made beneficially in the machinery of the Offices, which I will (DP) take an opportunity of oidverting to on some
-future reenvio,
as I de sist understand that the
present ouguiry extends further therm to generalities.
My short experience of this bolong (although longer than that of the Attorney General prevents my speaking
some things of which anfidently I have formed an opinion. Joine
Some of the defects, doubtless, I live, not yet
found not.
14
(Signed) Ambrose Porous,
True befy.
21 June 1856.
Extonal Scoretory.
Cory.
Ason 221
Remarts of 4. ! Tarrant m
Attorney General's letter to Colonial Sientary dated 31st May 1856.
With
3/26
regard to the 126 part of the
letter Ishall simply confine myself
to stating that Jemecive the Chief
Iustice reading of lignia Soneratis
Reynis
منا
pt. March 1847, dic. 41 and Bbinanec
852 de 15 to be the my most
14 81852
સંર
desirable (as a party about to be tied
showin
for felony
at least as
his
defense
certaing be allowed
long a time to
M Mic
prepare
charged within
muisdemeanor) and that until
lately I always entertained the
Lem
į
Į
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.